Henry Dampier

On the outer right side of history

  • Home
  • Contact

December 20, 2014 by henrydampier 4 Comments

The Progestant Work Ethic

Protestantism made its mark on the world in part due to its superior productive powers that began to really take off following the 30 Years’ War. The decline of Spain and later the Habsburg Empire, followed by the rises of Germany, England, and the other northern European states marked a major change in the character of European civilization and the nature of work.

The Protestant Work Ethic, as understood by Max Weber, has since come to fade, along with Protestantism more generally. More congregations have either become indistinguishable from secular progressives, or have otherwise ceased to even continue to exist.

What has replaced it, at least in spiritual similarity, is the TED revivalist sentiment towards work. TED actually stands for:

Technology
Entertainment
Design

Perhaps not so oddly enough, these are the areas in which Americans are supposed to be working in, the occupations that are the high-status occupations, none of which involve much of any physical labor. Instead, all that work has to do with the mind and the spirit, without getting ones’ hands dirty.

The old industrial economy, in a previous eruption of spiritual concern with the environmentalist movement, was deemed impossibly sinful. This is one of the reasons why much of it, at least in terms of manpower intensive work, has been sent overseas: it has less to do with real efficiency, and more to do with regulatory arbitrage and tax efficiency. It’s better to manage those enormous factories overseas in China because the laws and some other factors make it tougher to do in the US and in other European countries.

Young progs, unlike the old prots, will declare themselves wholly dedicated to their work, which they are ‘passionate’ about, and which they consider to be a sacred ‘mission’ guided by a ‘vision’ from their corporate leader, with a motivation beyond money. They are screened for this sort of language at university and by interviewers, who are keen to sift out unbelievers who might just be looking for a good job that will help them bring some money home for the missus and the little ones.

Protestants believed that, through disciplined work, they glorified God. They did not believe that gleaming ikons glorified the trinity, but they did think that hard work and frugality did.

TED revivalists believe that, through innovative mind-work, they glorify the world through good works, with no special divine mission. Their demonstrated ecstasy, passion, and belief in their corporate mission is what glorifies them, and perhaps the company that they work for, giving their employer’s logo a special kind of spiritual numina.

Any material or familial obligations have been mostly forgotten. In fact, if you’re multiple-times TED speaker Elizabeth Gilbert, part of what you glorify is your abandonment of your family obligations, and your pursuit of self-glorification, rather than bringing glory to God.

Christopher Lasch might say that this is another indicator that the better sorts of person have put an image of themselves up as an object of worship, rather than a God: a rather odd form of idolotry. At least worship a cow or a pig. Much less unseemly.

The TED congregants already believe that they are among the Elect, behaving and speaking as if they know that whatever they do, they have already achieved salvation, because they know they’re among the good and beautiful people. It is this self-obsessed vanity that leads to their countless errors, and will undo everything that they have worked for. It would be nice if it could be described as a tragic flaw, but it’s really more accurate to call it a comic flaw.

They glorify false images of themselves at the expense of what their real selves might have been, always eager to appear selfless through gross acts of self-absorbtion, eager to be seen doing good works for faraway strangers while abandoning the people closest to them.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Economics

December 19, 2014 by henrydampier 13 Comments

Industrial Success, Dysgenic Failure

Earlier this year, I read Richard Lynn’s Dysgenics. Unfortunately, I don’t remember all that much from it, in part because it was just retelling a lot of history that I was already aware of from a separate perspective.

The push-back against Darwin by secular thinkers has been far more wide-ranging and successful than the reaction against it by religious thinkers ever was. I remember seeing a performance with Brian Dennehy some years ago of Inherit the Wind, and I think that’s still the extent to which the urban left views evolution: it’s a brickbat to thwack the Williams Jennings Bryans of the world, rather than a theory that describes human evolution as well as it does for other species.

The same people who will snicker at Texans and Kansans for being hicks who don’t believe in evolution will accuse you of being an evil bigot for believing in human evolution.

One of the reasons that this might be is that, politically, it’s difficult to suggest that the consequences of the Green and Industrial revolutions may not have been entirely benign. By weakening selection pressures on the species, we have been deteriorating ourselves in terms of genetic quality.

Shutting off this inquiry has likely lead to an enormous number of health problems in the general population. Making evolutionary thinking unpopular is one of the reasons why sensible dietary advice and research has had to go underground, until recently becoming successful with such buzzwords like ‘paleo diet’ gaining currency, with a backing in evolutionary theory.

The idea of human evolution is also quite threatening to the pretensions of the egalitarian left, which holds that anyone can be remade into anything with the right education. If it in fact takes generations for major changes to happen in generations, absent strokes of fortune, then many egalitarian pretensions must also fade away, and traditional emphases on family, family quality, and child-rearing become more readily understandable.

In particular, with knowledge of evolution, which is not entirely out of step with traditional emphases on blood and family honor, feminism turns from an important moral initiative into something that’s easier to perceive as a dire social problem. To the extent that you encourage the smartest women from the best families to turn themselves into dissolute corporate strivers, you also encourage the race if not the species to destroy itself in terms of quality.

The push to get more women into more high-performance career tracks at the expense of having children stops looking like a noble, heroic advancement of the species, and more like the cannibalization of the world’s genetic cream to try to squeeze out a few percentage points of greater output temporarily before an enormous crash. The demographic collapses in Japan, Germany, the rest of Europe, and even the United States are coincident with high rates of female education and serious workforce participation outside the home.

You have these goofy initiatives about ‘teaching women to code,’ in the present, instead of teaching them to bear sons who will learn to code in 15 years, and will be better at it and be more capable of sticking with it than the women are. Such initiatives are aimed at producing greater profits for companies in a few years, but what happens in 30 years when those same women barely succeed at reproducing themselves effectively?

Sure, you can try to replace a single bright white person with 50 mestizos, but the type of output that you’re going to get from the replacements is not going to be the same, and the culture is not going to be the same either.

Further, encouraging later births also encourages greater birth defects, which further damages the ability of the best and brightest to reproduce itself effectively.

These sorts of programs to deal with dysgenic consequences of inane policies tend to dance around the root causes, because the root causes are the people who shape the policies, and the societies that have forsaken in the future in favor of the present.

[Update, 2:23 pm]

The archive.org version of the Richard Lynn book contains many broken tables and other issues in .epub. Because this book is out of print, it’s only available at a relatively high price as a hard copy. You can find it in print at the link below, or download it for free through the previous link.

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: HBD

December 19, 2014 by henrydampier 5 Comments

Selling Out to Jeff Bezos

You may have noticed the addition of the new Advertising Policy page above.

Content isn’t free. Hosting isn’t free. My time isn’t free (it’s actually fairly expensive). Your attention and time aren’t free, either.

In addition to my upcoming book(s), I have to make sure that my incentives are such that I can continue to write for you, the audience. I also don’t want to add display advertising to this site, because it’s not well suited to it, it damages performance, and my traffic is unlikely to become high enough to make it worthwhile.

As a compromise, and as a way to motivate myself to read more interesting books, I’m instead including Amazon Affiliate links in my book reviews and in other posts in which I may shill for other things.

I will not promote crappy products just to make a dollar off of you. Anything that I plug will be worth buying.

I should also say that, in my day job, I don’t promote crappy products, services, or companies either, because it makes me too depressed to do it, and it’s easier to sell good things.

If you have any comments or concerns about this, please tell me. In particular, if when you see the affiliate links, you think they’re disruptive, and would rather that I use text-only links (or none at all), please say so.

If you think something sucks, you can say so in the comments, and I won’t censor you unless you’re annoying for some other reason.

The money will go towards:

  • More time writing books and researching.
  • More time and money spent on various darkly enlightened publishing projects.
  • Defraying some of the losses that I incur by writing like this in terms of opportunity costs.
  • Ensuring that this is sustainable for the next 2, 5, or 10+ years.
  • Improved hosting for this website (it’s on ghetto shared hosting). This would be a modest expense. The site already has enough traffic that it would be improved by even a basic upgrade, although, with caching, the performance is acceptable.
  • Cover art fees, publishing fees, web development fees, web design fees, editorial fees, specialized software, and other similar publishing expenses.
  • Advertising & marketing expenses for new books.

My goal is to never have to solicit donations or other kinds of subscription. My problem with those types of support is that they:

  • Are highly subjective. The fundraiser is under pressure to justify the value of what they’re doing all the time.
  • Do not necessarily generate good value for donors.
  • Are over-reliant on rich donors who might mismanage the production to suit their own interests.
  • Align my incentives to being a better beggar rather than being better at generating value for readers.
  • Gives me an incentive to grab attention from other authors, rather than giving me an incentive to share the spotlight with other authors in our space.
  • If donor behavior is inconsistent, it gives the site an incentive to churn the readership to look for new donors.

To be clear, I don’t anticipate that this will generate much revenue relative to what I could earn at my day job. Even affiliates that I know that earn over $1m/year took at least a few years before they got anywhere with it. This is mainly to get things started, and and to reduce the pressure on me to quit between now and then.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Admin

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • …
  • 113
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • New Contact E-Mail and Site Cleanup
  • My Debut Column at the Daily Caller: “Who Is Pepe, Really?”
  • Terrorism Creates Jobs
  • Dyga on Abbot’s Defeat
  • The Subway Vigilante On Policing

Categories

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 158 other subscribers

Top Posts & Pages

  • Divorce and the Pressures on Men and Women

Copyright © 2025 · Generate Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

%d