Henry Dampier

On the outer right side of history

by 5 Comments

The Globalist Elite Has No Cohesion

The attempt to form a global elite has failed, except at the surface. There are many reasons for this:

  • Lack of religious cohesion
  • Lack of ethnic cohesion and intermarriage except across certain lines
  • Lack of geographic cohesion
  • Lack of linguistic cohesion
  • Lack of shared moral rules
  • Lack of a functioning international legal framework (which will never happen for the above reasons)
  • Inability to command loyalty at a local level

This notion that the men of Moncole Magazine and Davos can rule over seven billion people without using much force at all has not been proven. And in fact, we see betrayal and backstabbing after backstabbing occur on the global scene.

If there was a truly global elite, Russia would be part of the fold. China would not be pivoting between the US and Russia as the situation suited it. Tell-all memoirs about CIA manipulation of the German press would not be top best-sellers.

Go and ask a White student at an Ivy League college what they think of their Chinese co-students. Ask the Chinese students what they think of their cracker counterparts. At the places where diversity propaganda is the strongest, cohesion is often rather weak.

The elite-formation institutions of the West used to exist largely to form strong bonds between future male leaders. These institutions are now primarily seen as places of both meaningless and extreme competition within the elite, which typically fails to produce much appreciable excellence. Most of the most lauded leaders from the current and previous generations are drop-outs who did not need to use the now-degraded elite formation institutions.

In fact, what is a tech startup but a tiny fraternity, almost always all-male, that includes stressful bonding rituals and typical young male tomfoolery?

Inviting the world’s best students was supposed to solidify a new American century. However, China’s ambassador to the US berates the latter country in one of the leading Foreign Policy magazines. Prime Minister Modi of India openly flouts America.

Wasn’t the globalist program supposed to foster international cooperation in a new ‘flat’ and ‘global’ world? Whatever happened to that? Will there be any accountability for the failure of this strategy?

by 14 Comments

England: The Land of Discount Slaves

After the release of the ‘Easy Meat’ report (which I read and summarized in that link), some predicted that the country would reform its ways and kick out the slavers.

Instead, roughly nothing has happened, although it has been used for a good headline on a UKIP advertising campaign.

Ukip 1400 Rotherham ad campaign.

For this ad, many prestige publications attacked the party, rather than perhaps considering the problems in their society that lead to tens of thousands of girls being enslaved for profit (often enormous profit, exceeding £600,000 annually per girl).

While there has been some bureaucratic shuffling here and there, and a few concerned newspaper headlines, essentially nothing has been done, and in fact the original report has been largely ignored in favor of the soundbite-friendly ‘1,400’ number, and the localization to a single region when the original report substantiated complaints to the entire country and the broader region of Northern Europe.

Because this has been a long term pattern in the UK, we should not expect anything to change on a dime. In fact, we should expect the problem (which is only a problem for white Britons — for slavers, it’s a bonanza of profitable pleasure) to become considerably more acute, and more widespread over the next decade.

Since the UK has elected to pursue the enlightenment system of reformatory criminal justice, we should expect more Muslim entrepreneurs to respond to the enormous profits that even an idiot can scoop up in front of the playgrounds of UK schools for the cost of a six pack of lukewarm beer. The worst that the state can do is put a person into a brief vacation-type jail sentence, after which he is free to return to his former line of crooked employment.

When a single kidnapping can provide more money in a year than a typical British person is likely to earn in a lifetime, you’d be quite stupid, at least materially speaking, to enter any other business. Further, kidnappers seem to enjoy higher status than most other classes of UK businessman.

For one, to be of diverse descent is to automatically enjoy a protected status. For another, it creates no emissions, it’s a green business, it requires no factory equipment, and most of the front line workers are young women.

The country that piously abolished slavery is becoming incapable of condemning the enslavement of its own population. It has become so accustomed to being able to issue moral complaints about other societies without actually having to do anything themselves that, when a moral crisis appears, it has no capacity to act in a meaningful way. It can create bureaucratic task forces and place charities on watch lists, but to take decisive action has become politically unspeakable.

If we accept the proposition the women of a country are its future, we should translate that into the observation that the future of the United Kingdom is slavery.

The West, accustomed to being on top of the world, may soon find big parts of itself being seized and trundled off to foreign hoards. Having lost the will to live, to defend itself, having taken the reflexive pose of toleration without regard to what is to be tolerated, it is losing its freedom.

We should also consider, that historically speaking, for such things to happen is not beyond the pale, and is actually quite normal. For all of Europe to be free of Oriental despotism of all kinds is odd. What is normal is for big swaths of what we call European countries to be dominated by foreign invaders for centuries at a time. This was certainly the case until World War I decimated the Ottomans, and it was the case before the Ottomans made Constantinople their new capitol.

Also, it is not ‘the people’ who wake up and resist the invaders. It’s also not typically ‘one great man’ who emerges from ‘the people’ to push them back. Far more typical is for the aristocracy to make a good living selling their own people out to the invaders, whom they are too weak and weak-willed to resist.

When a people are broken, everyone is broken, from bottom to top, and whatever deliverance may be forthcoming typically comes from outside, and at a different time.

by 3 Comments

America Will Be Bypassed

The US, for longer than its satellite European states, has made a strong commitment to producing equality in life outcomes for all people regardless of race, national origin, gender, and inborn talent.

This represents an unlimited obligation that can be called in by progressives for any expenditure. Any institution or practice that produces unequal outcomes may be tolerated for a time insomuch as it provides some financing for the broader egalitarian goals of the revolutionary society. But once the political leadership loses patience with those institutions that have been granted a stay of execution, judgment comes swiftly, inexorably, and chaotically.

Other civilizations, notably the ones rising in the East, are only committed to egalitarianism insomuch as they are committed to being American colonies. But this is also the case even in long-occupied countries like Germany.

In Germany, the best-selling book on Amazon and by other book retailers for some weeks now has been a tell-all by a former prominent journalist explaining how the CIA manipulates the most prestigious media outlets in the country to reflect the wishes of American foreign policy. To students of history, this shouldn’t be a surprise. To people who still believe in the American idea with childlike illusions, this ought to be shameful.

All Western governments have similarly committed themselves to an egalitarian idea as unreachable as the egalitarian ideas that animated the Soviet Union. These missions are as doomed as the missions of the USSR were.

In the future, countries that do not follow the US down its doomed path will enjoy more success, happiness, and flourishing on their own terms. The countries that elect to follow America off the abyss of its own choosing will meet only doom.

Top Posts & Pages